Institute for International Research

Know how to achieve

Main menu

My IIR

Login form

Sign Up

Registration

Online Registration is open!

Customer Service

Have a question about this event?
Customer Service representatives are available to help from 8 AM - 6 PM EST
Call 888-670-8200


Need Technical Assistance With this Website?
Send an email to IIR's Web Department

Find another IIR Event

Event Search Form by Industry

4th Annual Cell Based Assays 4th Annual Cell Based Assays

October 06 - 08, 2008 | InterContinental San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Main Conference Day Two

Main Conference Day Two

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

8:30Morning Coffee
9:00Chairpersons’ Recap of Day One
- Shalini Gupta, PhD, Director, Medical Sciences, AMGEN
9:15Statistical Process Control for Improved Assay Development Production and Transfer
The most important aspect of how we develop, validate, maintain, and possibly transfer assays is rooted in the data. It is the data that inform us as to how we should act, where we should go, and if our processes are capable of performing at some required level. Data analysis is the key to this and statistical techniques are tools that we use. Discusses types of charts that are used, how these charts can tell us if our processes are in control, and where we can use these charts in the development, production, and transfer processes.
- Martin Kane, MS CRE, Senior Manager, Process Statistics, HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES
10:00Optimization and Analysis of Sources of Variation in theWestern Blot Neuro-2a cell based Assay Via Application of the Weighted Four-Parameter Logistic Model
Purpose. The Neuro-2a cell based assay is a potency assay that uses 96-well plates and differentiated Neuro-2a cells in a Western Blot read-out. It has been designed to measure all three steps in BoNT/A activity: receptor binding, internalization and translocation, and catalytic activity. Mathematical modeling of the Neuro-2a dose-response curve via the four-parameter logistic model [4PL] has been used not only (1) to improve this assay but also (2) to characterize it after finalization. Methods: (1) The 4PL was applied to actual data and then used to simulate the likely results for three different dose regimens of interest. The 4PL was then applied to the simulated data and the resulting model parameters and convergence were monitored. The optimal dose regimen was defined as the one yielding estimated parameters as close to nominal as possible while also causing the fewest convergence problems. (2) After optimization, routine testing was initiated, yielding a historical database spanning nine months. Weighted four-parameter logistic models were separately fitted to the individual response curve data in this historical database. The fitted asymptotes, EC50, HillSlope, and weighting parameters values were then regressed on variables measuring the relevant extrinsic variability sources (such as operator id and cell passage numbers). Results: (1) The nature of the collaborative relationship, and its benefits, between the Depts. of Biostatistics and Biological Sciences will be discussed. Appropriate dose optimization was a direct result of this collaborative effort. (2) Statistically significant sources of extrinsic assay variability will be noted and quantified. The results will then be used to indicate how a unified mixed-effects weighted four-parameter logistic model might be built. The benefits of unified mixedeffects model-building will be noted.
- David Paul, PhD, Manager, Department of Biostatistics, ALLERGAN
10:45Morning Networking Break
11:15Statistical Analysis of Cell Based Assay Data
  • Setting assay acceptance criteria
  • Statistical approaches and strategies for determination of robust cut points in immunogenicity assays
  • Find one software package that one can easily use to trend data, perform anova, and test for parallelism all in one swoop
  • The multitude of projects/multi-tasking and staying on top of new technologies and their applications to existing programs FDA/USP recommended non-linear curve fit data analysis
  • Setting minimum requirements
  • Identifying testing parameters
  • Comparison with preclinical data
  • Setting specification limits on bio-assays
  • Match sensitivity of cell based assay to ELISA like methods controlling sensitivity drift
  • - Martin Kane, MS CRE, Senior Manager, Process Statistics, HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES
    - David Paul, Manager Biostatistician, Biostatistics, ALLERGAN
12:00Networking Luncheon
1:15

Topic TBA 

Pankaj Oberoi, Meso Scale Discovery

2:00New Technologies Applied to Cell Based Assay Development
  • Homogeneous methods - add and read type cell based assays
  • Assays using primary cells, frozen, division-arrested cells, 3-D cultures.
  • Nanotechnology and its application in cell based assays
  • Automated potency assays with better precision and accuracy
  • 3D co-culture tube formation assay
  • Tumor cell coculture with endothelial cell assay
  • Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer or BRET
  • Appropriate liquid handling instrumentation for complete automation of cell based assays
  • cell based assays used for high throughput screening in drug discovery
  • Molecular techniques used in cell based assays especially for lot release potency assays (example: mRNA, signaling pathways)
  • New Technology discussions
    • PCR-based assays
    • MSD
    • Luminex
    • FACS-based assays
- Shalini Gupta, PhD, Director, Medical Sciences, AMGEN
- Pankaj Oberoi, Mesoscale Discovery
- Stephen Ullrich, Senior Scientist, HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES
3:00Conference Concludes

Send To A Friend

Invite a colleague to join you at this event

Add Event To Calendar

Save the event dates in your Outlook calendar

Bottom menu

Copyright 2003-2006 IIR Holdings, Ltd. All rights Reserved

Powered by Interactive Agency Janmedia Interactive, Inc.